[ SECRET POST #3314 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3314 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I think the different is (or is supposed to be) that Lammily has a body that is *possible* where Barbie's old body was literally not something that could be achievable by a human person.

I don't think either should be brought out as representative of *everyone*. When you have one doll mold, that's impossible. For Lammily proposing the idea of multiple dolls on the first run may have been too costly (keep in mind that before all the attention, this was someone with nowhere near the money or resources of Barbie.)

That's why I think the new Barbie line of several dolls is a good thing. But I don't think it needs to KILL Lammily if people really want Lammily, like I said, I think the Barbie line is cuter and I don't like Lammily myself but I'm not going to wish something gone just because I'm not into it.

[(Anonymous)]

I think the coolest thing about Lammily is the sticker marks. Acne, freckles, scars, bruises, cellulite, and now underwear and menstrual pads! That's fucking awesome. Real people have that, so why not a fashion doll?

[(Anonymous)]

... because it's a fashion doll and it's not supposed to be real? It's basically just supposed to be a vehicle for the millions of outfits.

[(Anonymous)]

DA I don't know if "it isn't real" is a great argument against making something more realistic. A doll can have all the things anon above mentioned and still have 5 million outfits.

Even Barbie is based on reality to a certain extent, it's not like she's supposed to be some alien.

It's fine to enjoy the fantasy of Barbie but some people may like a different type of doll. Everyone is different, this is true for kids as well.

[(Anonymous)]

So why make her humanoid at all? Why not give us a purple-skinned, three-legged thing with cute dresses?

[(Anonymous)]

Monster High needs a three legged doll!

[otakugal15]

Well, we did get those Mer-people. Kala can be considered with mutiple "legs".