Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-01-30 03:26 pm
[ SECRET POST #3314 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3314 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 12:13 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 01:04 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 02:51 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 06:25 pm (UTC)(link)Mattel - We want to sell a product, so we're trying to find out what appeals to people.
Lammily - Barbie sucks. I'd never fuck a woman like Barbie, she looks too... cold and uppity, kinda bitchy you know? I like down to earth girls, the girl next door, someone who's not too vain and full of herself. Plus, uh, representation! Promoting healthy body image! Feminism! She's a Womyn! I'm such a good male feminist, give me money.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-31 07:17 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
And the prices are outrageous for how BAD the clothes are, which, like... It fails as a fashion doll right there.
That's the problem with a lot of small/independent companies launching any kind of fashion doll who doesn't fit the same scale as dolls already on the market, but at least most of those don't sound like total creeps when they attempt to do something different and eventually fail. But Mattel-- and the Barbie name, in particular-- is big enough, and with a mixed consumer base of kids and adult collectors, that they're able to launch new body types that will have a wide array of fashions, and while they won't be able to trade all their clothes with classic Barbie, they'll be able to share clothes with others who have the same body, and they'll be able to use the same accessories and props/furniture/houses, and it's still a risky move, but it's one that isn't doomed from the start, and I hope it pays off and that they get some shelf space in stores after a successful online launch.
(they don't look any less articulated than most Barbies to me-- her arms are straight instead of bent, but very few Barbies have fully articulated elbows. Even the ones that have that soft bendable knee, the articulation is only so-so. Aside from a few special ones, they're mainly jointed at the hips and shoulders and beyond that they might have a little flexibility, but I remember the days before they even had that. Play line fashion dolls in general aren't made to be extremely articulated-- which makes those that are stand out, I know MH girls are incredibly articulated, though they aren't regular fashion doll-scale as far as their bodies go and what clothes they wear. High end fashion dolls are sometimes very articulated, but not always. And then you have dolls that aren't considered 'fashion dolls' that are designed to be very articulated and poseable...)