case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-02-02 06:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #3317 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3317 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[D.Gray-man - Miranda Lotto]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Thick of It]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Golden Kamui]


__________________________________________________



08.
(The Lost Boys)


__________________________________________________



09.
[Marble Hornets/troyhasacamera]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.
[@midnight with Chris Hardwick]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 037 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Well that was not ok.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, but you shouldn't expect the relatives to track you down to do it. That is rapey.

Re: Well that was not ok.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
It's shady and deceptive and disrespectful, but let's not hastily throw around the word "rape" here.

Re: Well that was not ok.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
deceptive + sexual = rape

hth

Re: Well that was not ok.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 01:42 am (UTC)(link)
No, lack of consent + sexual = rape. Only if OP would have refused the client had they known the identity, then rape would apply. But we don't have that information. We don't know if OP would have refused and ended the cam, or continued and been okay with it, with the knowledge that the boyfriend was involved.

Calling everything "rape" belittles the act. It's fucking why girls get told to yell "fire" so someone will actually pay attention to our distress.

Re: Well that was not ok.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 09:16 am (UTC)(link)
consent requires you to be fully informed.

knowledge (of the full situation) + understanding (of consequences) + agreement = consent

so the full equation is

lack of knowledge + lack of understanding + agreement + sexual = rape

Think of it like this house of cards:

......./\....... Top Level - Non-rape sexual encounter
....../\/\...... Second Level - A sexual situation with agreement
...../\/\/\..... Third level - The persons understanding of who what and how he following events are going to happen.

You cannot remove one of the bottom cards without the whole lot coming down.