[ SECRET POST #3317 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3317 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[D.Gray-man - Miranda Lotto]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Thick of It]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Golden Kamui]


__________________________________________________



08.
(The Lost Boys)


__________________________________________________



09.
[Marble Hornets/troyhasacamera]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.
[@midnight with Chris Hardwick]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 037 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Well that was not ok.

[(Anonymous)]

Even if OP HAD been intimate with her BF it's still the same violation. Consent given once does not mean that they always from then on consent.

Re: Well that was not ok.

[(Anonymous)]

When OP accepts sex work clients, they are consenting to that client. If OP accepts anon clients, that's a risk they take. It may be creepy from a morals standpoint, but legally, the BF did absolutely nothing wrong.

Re: Well that was not ok.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

I really don't think anyone's talking legality here. We're all saying the boyfriend did some shady thing and that OP has every right to be upset about it.

Re: Well that was not ok.

[(Anonymous)]

When people start talking about violation of consent, they're bringing legality into it.

Re: Well that was not ok.

[(Anonymous)]

Only if it involves a legal document. If BF signed something saying he wouldn't go check out OP's cam, sure, legal. This is just "he lied to me, and is a jerk". Which is a moral issue.

Re: Well that was not ok.

[(Anonymous)]

You realize you just said rape isn't a thing, right?

Re: Well that was not ok.

[(Anonymous)]

No amount of twisting can turn the words I wrote into that. Troll better next time.

Re: Well that was not ok.

[(Anonymous)]

I say: Bringing "violation of consent" into the discussion brings legality into it.

You say: Only if it involves a legal document.

If someone rapes me, they have violated my consent to sex. There was no legal document involved. When other people here talk about this as a violation of consent -- however wrong they may be -- they're drawing an equivalent to rape (by deception). That is making legality an issue.

Tell me again how I'm trolling.

Re: Well that was not ok.

[(Anonymous)]

Damn son, you got schooled!