case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-02-02 06:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #3317 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3317 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[D.Gray-man - Miranda Lotto]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Thick of It]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Golden Kamui]


__________________________________________________



08.
(The Lost Boys)


__________________________________________________



09.
[Marble Hornets/troyhasacamera]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.
[@midnight with Chris Hardwick]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 037 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Well that was not ok.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
Okay, I can see you being pissed off about it but...

If you're doing webcam stuff with the buffer of 'anonymous' clients, then that's kind of the risk you take. That someone you know and/or love will see. If you didn't want him to ever see your 'job' then that should have been laid out on the table beforehand. It's not an invasion of privacy if it's not private.

Re: Well that was not ok.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 01:50 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think its about him seeing her job, clearly he knew about it, its that they did a whole session and he didn't tell her, and only let her know by throwing a private thing they shared into it at the very end. It's about him being deceitful and basically mocking her job, not him knowing.

Re: Well that was not ok.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
It's not an invasion of privacy if it's not private.

EXACTLY. There's nothing private about online "anon" sex work. To pretend there is to delude yourself.

Re: Well that was not ok.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-03 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
NAYRT

I don't know that it's an invasion of privacy but I do think it's a violation of an implicit kind of trust? Like, it's not like this is some random stranger, it's someone that you have a relationship with, and I don't think it's out of bounds to expect someone that you have a relationship with to respect your boundaries in that regard.

Probably OP could have communicated her feelings on this better but I do think it was kind of messed up for the BF to do.