[ SECRET POST #3317 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3317 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[D.Gray-man - Miranda Lotto]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Thick of It]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Golden Kamui]


__________________________________________________



08.
(The Lost Boys)


__________________________________________________



09.
[Marble Hornets/troyhasacamera]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.
[@midnight with Chris Hardwick]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 037 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

So yes, I understand why Natasha would call herself a monster.

I totally agree with this, and thought it was a good way to develop/build on Natasha's character. I still thought the writing in this scene was horrendous, though. To me, it's a bit shocking that a sympathetic listener (Bruce included) would watch someone talk about their abuse and dehumanizing treatment while they were growing up, call themselves a monster (in specific reference to not being able to have kids anymore), and their reaction not being, "Jesus, aren't you being a little hard on yourself?"

To me, it makes perfect sense that Natasha is way way way harsh and unforgiving of herself. Other characters probably wouldn't be, and from a meta point of view (criticizing the writing as it interacts with the audience), leaving a line that potentially implies that the inability to have children (or willingly giving up that ability) is monstrous, which is an ACTUAL response people who choose not to have children get in real life, leaving that line hanging in the air unchallenged by any character gives the impression that it's "obvious" to the audience that not being able to have children is a thing "normal" people feel monstrous about. Which can be super alienating!

Most of the criticism I've seen is about that, not "AOU Natasha has feelings, eww! I thought she was a strong female character. How could you do this to her?" Some of the criticism is somewhere between the two ("So... when can we have a female character whose 'humanization struggle arc' doesn't involve pregnancy or motherhood? I thought Natasha could have been that character.").