case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-02-04 06:23 pm

[ SECRET POST #3319 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3319 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Homestuck]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Manhunter, Criminal Minds, CSI and X-Files]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Heroes Reborn]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Story of Seasons]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Keanu Reeves]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[One Punch Man]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11. http://i.imgur.com/Pc6ksVv.png
[photo of naked dude in a suggestive(?) position]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 015 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2016-02-04 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, except that you never see that sort of inversion going the other way. It is always to add more gender roles never to remove gender roles from canons that follow them. It's lazy writing really. Rather than following the compex characterization of canon, people resort to tropes and roles and the typical romance template.
Edited 2016-02-04 23:44 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
You don't really see it in reverse, it's true. It sucks that you'll check out fic for a pairing where, say, the characters save each other all the time and it's fic after fic conforming to "damsel in distress" tropes.
cloudtrader: (Julep!)

[personal profile] cloudtrader 2016-02-05 04:07 am (UTC)(link)
You're accused of writing the male OOC if you do that.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-05 02:41 pm (UTC)(link)
People writing tropes you don't enjoy = lazy writing?

Could you possibly be more condescending?
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2016-02-05 04:57 pm (UTC)(link)
No. Relying on tropes rather than canon characterization is lazy writing when canon gives complex characters and writers instead use tropes that don't fit canon.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-05 06:06 pm (UTC)(link)
These authors are doing what they enjoy. They're writing their fantasies and subverting canon for their own amusement. Laziness had nothing to do with it, and it makes you look like a jackass when you insist it does.