fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #3319 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3319 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

[Homestuck]

__________________________________________________

03.

[Manhunter, Criminal Minds, CSI and X-Files]

__________________________________________________

04.

[Heroes Reborn]

__________________________________________________

05.

[Story of Seasons]

__________________________________________________

06.

[Keanu Reeves]

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

[One Punch Man]

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11. http://i.imgur.com/Pc6ksVv.png
[photo of naked dude in a suggestive(?) position]

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 015 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Okay, fine, I agree with you there. But you are talking as if that one emotional support animal being abused means that that sort of animal shouldn't be allowed at all. There is no reason to think most of them are being abused, and I don't think policy should be based on that one any more than one guide dog not being cared for means no blind people should be allowed to have guide dogs. The abused animals should be taken away, but those who can care for the animals should be allowed to keep them if they've gone through the proper procedure regardless of whether they are guide dogs or emotional support dogs.

I never said that, and I did say animals can provide really amazing support. Everyone's situation is different, and that call is up for a licensed healthcare provider to make. But I maintain that if a person is ill enough where they can't care for themselves, then they cannot be the primary caregiver for support animals. Or if their illness in any way jeopardizes the care they are able to give that animal. That's why someone certified and professional who is regularly involved in the individual's mental health care should be the one to say both that the individual needs the ESA to be successful in school and they are fit to be able to care for the animal. My point is that universities should have strict standards for what kinds of service or support animals the allow and when, not that they shouldn't be allowed at all.

I don't think the universities should be the ones to decide that, though. A doctor is the only one who can assess whether a person needs the animal or not, and the doctor and whatever the place is that is giving the animals should be the ones deciding whether the person needs an animal and whether they can care for the animal. It shouldn't be based on kinds of service or support animals at all. It should be a case by case basis based on the individual person. And universities aren't qualified to make that decision.

I think we're missing something big here. There's a huge difference between an emotional support animal being allowed on campus and being allowed in dorms.

Can an emotional support animal be perfectly well taken care of by a college student? Of course. In a dorm? Dorm rooms are tiny. It's a horible idea.

In the case of seeing eye dogs: they're very well trained to deal with stress, and students with them tend to be in single rooms. An emotional support animal is generally untrained--it's just a normal pet. A normal dorm is a horrible place for them.

An apartment would be different--but does a residence life office want dogs and cats potentially peeing all over the place or destroying furniture? There's a reason a lot of apartment buildings don't allow pets.

Edited 2016-02-05 05:18 (UTC)

If they need the animal, though. Like, say, if they have panic attacks and/or flashbacks and the animal is the one thing that can calm them. It would seem to me to be the same as a blind person with a guide dog living in the dorm. Not a great idea, but if there is nowhere else they can live and that's where they need to be to go to school then I think it should be allowed. Of course they'd have to make sure the animal could handle it. But that would be an individual decision, not something that should be outright banned.

Being blind isn't a psychological issue--if something happens to the dog, the blind person is inconvenienced but not put in a dangerous situation if that makes sense; they'd just need a different way to get around. I hate to say it but if you're in such a state that you have panic attacks or flashbacks without an animal, living in a dorm away from your support network might be a really bad idea.

Cases where there are no other places where a college student can live are rare--in the US at least you're allowed to use your loans to live off campus. Outside major cities that tends to be a better deal anyway.

And what about other students? My mom and brother have really horrible dog and cat allergies--if they had to live in close proximity with a dog or cat they'd be in serious discomfort.

Edited 2016-02-05 05:48 (UTC)

The training thing is why I would say hell no to allowing ESAs in dorms. Guide dogs go through really rigorous training. One of my family members volunteers with them and it's months and months of training and even then many dogs aren't suitable and don't pass the program. The same is true for many other types of service dogs.

But an ESA is literally just a pet. You aren't assigned an ESA by an agency that's screening the animals for behavioral issues and trying to place them with an appropriate master, and there's no training required at all. Which means someone's ESA might be totally unsuited for life in a dorm, let alone life around other strange people.

Service dogs are required legally to be trained to certain standards, so that they can be allowed in public spaces without being a danger to other people. ESAs aren't.

These are my thoughts as well. I don't see how a dorm room would in any way provide a cat or dog with a good, even acceptable quality of life. It's too small and crowded, and no, it wouldn't be okay to let your pet wander the halls. Not to mention, in a dorm room, you're so close to the other students, what if allergy issues came up? In apartment style residences, it might be something different. But as you said, ESAs are just pets - they aren't trained at all. They may howl, pee on stuff, destroy furniture. I could understand completely why a university might be apprehensive about allowing random pets into their residences, considering how much universities struggle for funding in the first place. But if the person who needs the ESA is going to foot the entire bill if their animal causes damages, I don't see a problem, provided the animal does not disturb other students (no loud constant barking or howling). Maybe a solution would be for universities to have one apartment or whatever where cats and dogs are permitted, upon pet deposits being paid.

[ SECRET POST #3319 ]

Re: Should universities allow "ESA" Emotional Support Animals in dorms?

Re: Should universities allow "ESA" Emotional Support Animals in dorms?

Re: Should universities allow "ESA" Emotional Support Animals in dorms?

Re: Should universities allow "ESA" Emotional Support Animals in dorms?

Re: Should universities allow "ESA" Emotional Support Animals in dorms?

Re: Should universities allow "ESA" Emotional Support Animals in dorms?

Re: Should universities allow "ESA" Emotional Support Animals in dorms?

Re: Should universities allow "ESA" Emotional Support Animals in dorms?