[ SECRET POST #3327 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3327 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Leonard Snart/Ray Palmer, DC's Legends of Tomorrow]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________





























05. [SPOILERS for Downton Abbey]





__________________________________________________



06.[WARNING for suicide]



[Mare Internum]


__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for sexual assault]



[Love Live - sorry anon who wanted it Saturday, trying to keep the warning ones on Friday]


__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for rape, abuse, etc]





__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for rape/dub-con, child abuse]





__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for rape]





__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for underage sex]






__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for sexual abuse, child abuse]




























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #475.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[nonnymouscawitz]

I'm not comparing the situation with Bowie to child molestation, I am saying that the phrase 'she acted like an adult' has unfortunate connotations, which was an issue with your phrasing and not the Bowie situation.

Although I AM getting a little frustrated that no matter how many times I say 'I agree, if she led him to believe he was older, it's not his fault he's not psychic' you seem determined to argue with me about how it's not his fault if he didn't know which is... exactly what I've been saying.

[sachiko_san]

Yes, an unfortunate phrase, but what what was he supposed to think when she looks more an adult than a child and it was a place one wouldn't expect to see a child and she's a groupie?

Because most of what you said did not come off that way to me and the fact that you keep replying and your replies come off as "but-but-but-!"

[nonnymouscawitz]

It's just a phrase I am uncomfortable with. It has nothing at all to do with Bowie and what happened. And I am perfectly ok with it being a case of me being oversensitive.

I think you should go back and reread because everything I wrote was 'If Bowie knew, gross, but if he didn't, not his fault.' I kept replying because your response to that was 'But if he didn't know it wasn't his fault' and I said 'Yes, I agree' and then you would reply and so on and so forth. EDIT: Looking back our conversation was a lot shorter than I thought it was but yes, I was saying from the beginning that it was only gross if he knew she was underage.

[sachiko_san]

That was my problem with the whole thing though, there probably was no if. It was David Bowie, not Jimmy Page (I believe I have the right person, the guy who was with that teenage girl and hid her until she was of age).

[nonnymouscawitz]

Yes, it is probable there was no if, but since we don't know for sure, it's perfectly reasonable to discuss the if. Hell, even if we 100% knew she personally showed him her ID and said 'I'm totes 18' it would still be perfectly within reason to say 'Well if he'd known she was underage it would be gross but since he didn't...' and in fact, that's likely exactly what I would say in that situation. Arguing about it is silly as we are literally saying the exact same thing with different words. Saying 'if he'd known it would be gross' does not retroactively make him know.

[sachiko_san]

Pretty much yeah.