[ SECRET POST #3328 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3328 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 069 secrets from Secret Submission Post #476.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

That's trying to establish the thing as canon. It doesn't imply to me that it's a major thematic concern of Moffat's, let alone some kind of sexual fetish.

Is this just about being angry Doctor Who might regenerate into a woman?

[(Anonymous)]

i worry that when he does it that the viewing figures freefall will be terminal to the show

the licence fee paying british public don't want it at all

hes lost so many viewers already because of it

he talks about it really creepily at cons and in interviews too

its something he is really into and he has shoved his perversion into canon and masked it as an attempt to appease the commentator press who bitched about him not being feminist

now he is probably going to ram it through the main character and because the uk public have a clear image of the doctor as a white male they are going to turn off and well be back in nineteen eightynine again with no virgin books to pick things up

his fetish is going to get the show cancelled because the people who he is using as the excuse to rework canon like never before are not regular viewers

they just like the concept

[(Anonymous)]

"his perversion"

Is genderswap stuff necessarily perversion?

[(Anonymous)]

Different Anon I wouldn't say genderswap is perversion but I do feel like Moffat had the Master change genders just so they could make out (because for some reason they couldn't make out as two men, even though they could flirt all day and night.)

Moffat has some really... odd views about women as well so it's hard to view his genderswaps as progressive (especially since they typically mean turning women into a stereotype.)

[(Anonymous)]

the way moffat does it

yes

yes it is

[(Anonymous)]

even if it's a kink, it's not perversion

[(Anonymous)]

a kink can still be a perversion if the pervert seeking it carries it out in a perverted manner

[(Anonymous)]

Given that he's leaving and the selection of the next Doctor is down to Chris Chibnell, I think you're wrong about that.

[(Anonymous)]

You believe a single word he says? After all the times he's lied, blatantly?