[ SECRET POST #3328 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3328 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 069 secrets from Secret Submission Post #476.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

My experience has been just that - behavior from both sides has made it very difficult to discuss such characters without being called out as an apologist, even if you state that the character's actions were wrong and unjustified.

There are some people who say that sympathetic villains are misunderstood woobies, and others who say that they're utter monsters with no sympathetic qualities whatsoever. There's a gray area, though, as you pointed out - you can discuss a villain as a complex and even sympathetic character while understanding that their actions are wrong.

[darkmanifest]

That gray area is my favorite, and yet so tricky to find. It's hard to separate character discussion from personal preference, especially when discussion is always trying to make it personal, like your ideas of fictional characters somehow make you a questionable person.