[ SECRET POST #3329 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3329 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #476.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

She's a terrible person. She's a con artist who shames women, treats them as though they have no agency, discards women who have bad things happen to them because then there's nothing more than a "damsel in distress" with nothing else relevant about them, gets nearly everything wrong about her claims...and then tries to pass it off as feminist.

[(Anonymous)]

LOL. By "women" you mean video game characters? I don't like her either, but too many of you guys act like her criticism of the way female characters are written is the same as shaming real women, and confuse narrative agency ("she likes to dress that way!" "she chose to do that stupid thing because she had no better choices!") with the fact that characters have no real agency because they're written by people ("she likes to dress that way because her creator decided she would" "she chose to do that stupid thing because she was deliberately written into a situation where she had no better choices")

[(Anonymous)]

Actually she DOES shame real women by doing that. It encourages judging people, especially women, for what they wear.

And remember her claim about Bayonetta being a porn simulator and designed for male tittilation? Yeah, designed by a woman. But that doesn't matter to Sarkeesian because she'd rather spread the view that sexy women in fiction are all about pandering to men. Which means she denies that women have sexual power fantasies or could design something to appeal to their own desires.