Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-02-14 04:08 pm
[ SECRET POST #3329 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3329 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #476.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
We do? I don't really. Maybe this has personal variance.
Also you're kind of contradicting yourself. Like before you said "it's not immoral to sexually objectify people", then elsewhere in the thread you're saying "but it IS immoral, that's what I actually meant!" and now you're moving goalposts by saying "well what I MEANT was that it is okay but only for a few seconds/minutes, after that it's immoral".
btw I totally think it's possible to go "wow, sexy" without objectifying someone. However that particular reaction might be actually pretty similar and we're having a semantics argument. I'm not really sure. I don't think it's inherently objectifying to look at someone, feel attraction, and go "damn".