[ SECRET POST #3338 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3338 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 036 secrets from Secret Submission Post #477.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

IDGI. What's wrong with a character choosing to have sex with someone they presumably care about to keep them alive? Or is it the "celibacy=death" concept?

[(Anonymous)]

I think its the "women are only good for sex" message that OP has a problem with. Its why i stopped reading Anita Blake.

[(Anonymous)]

That interpretation sounds like kind of a leap to me.

[(Anonymous)]

But there are a bunch of female characters in the story who aren't good for sex.

[(Anonymous)]

No, it's the extension of the "blue balls" myth - if women don't sex men up it's them being withholding teases/uptight meanies rather than making a choice as autonomous people.

[(Anonymous)]

Where are you getting 'women are only good for sex' out of Anita Blake? I thought it was pretty obvious the author was just writing down her own sexual fantasies about group sex/sex pollen type stuff (the ardeur has just made me SOOO turned on I MUST HAVE SEX OHHH), which is not even close to the worst kink out there.

The writing was bad, sure, but 'women are only good for sex' was never a part of the story.

[(Anonymous)]

It's stupid. As a plot development, it is stupid. It's not morally wrong. It's just bad.

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt
True, but OP made it sound like it was morally wrong and unfeminist.

OP

[(Anonymous)]

It seemed incredibly contrived, even by D&D webcomic standards. Plus I had the feeling it would turn out that the guy wasn't actually cursed and he'd just made it up to convince her to have sex with him, and it would be treated like it was a surprise twist no one saw coming.