case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-02-23 06:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #3338 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3338 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 036 secrets from Secret Submission Post #477.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Writers thread

(Anonymous) 2016-02-24 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
What should come first - writing or research?

(Context: I'm writing a piece that covers a broad range of eras. In the past, research has actually hindered ideas, but at the same time I don't want to be shallow.)
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Writers thread

[personal profile] philstar22 2016-02-24 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
It really depends? I tend to plot and outline first and then from there figure out areas where I need to research. And then go to writing the actual fic.

Re: Writers thread

(Anonymous) 2016-02-24 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
I tend to do them in tandem, I will know the plot outline and probably start writing, but research on and off as I write, especially cause then I can look for specific things I need to know.

Re: Writers thread

(Anonymous) 2016-02-24 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
General idea > lots of research > writing, usually. Do not dump your research on the reader's head.

On the other hand, if you're quickly glossing over something, you could write first and then research that specifically to make sure you're not talking out of your ass (ancient Romans eating potatoes or something).

Re: Writers thread

(Anonymous) 2016-02-24 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
It really depends on what works for you.

Like for me personally, researching is one of my favourite parts of the writing process. Instead of hindering ideas it really invigorates me and give me new ones.

Re: Writers thread

(Anonymous) 2016-02-24 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
The bunny, then lots of research, then writing. It wastes time and energy to write stuff which couldn't have happened, or anachronistic attitudes, I find.

Re: Writers thread

(Anonymous) 2016-02-24 02:26 am (UTC)(link)
Both at the same time. If you don't know anything about the era, do some basic research to start, but don't get bogged down. You don't need to know everything, just enough to start. As you write, you'll find new things you need to research (whether it's a broad topic or a really specific fact), and you can learn those things as you go.