case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-02-23 06:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #3338 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3338 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 036 secrets from Secret Submission Post #477.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: Choose to consider giving your prof a bad eval.

[personal profile] diet_poison 2016-02-24 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
I assume the black guy's race is relevant purely because of the "confirmed racist" doctor, who may otherwise be a viable partner for him, though her race isn't given and I suppose we're supposed to assume it's white, which makes the whole thing sort of racist, doesn't it?

Also re: the homosexual: if it were up to him to help repopulate the human race maybe he'd have sex with one or more women? But your response is really good and made me lol. Excellent point.

The last line - profs recycle stuff all the time, I don't get why that makes them lazy? If they see an exercise they think is good they may use it. (even if others don't think it's good)

I do think this feels rather dated, but I still found it interesting.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Choose to consider giving your prof a bad eval.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-02-24 03:25 am (UTC)(link)
Because it's incredibly dated.

I recycle stuff whenever I'm lucky enough to teach two of the same class--but I recycle GOOD, UP TO DATE stuff.

It'd be like a political exercise that assumes Obama was just elected. Using it for a couple years? Great! Using it now? Fucking lazy.
Edited 2016-02-24 03:26 (UTC)
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: Choose to consider giving your prof a bad eval.

[personal profile] diet_poison 2016-02-24 06:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Fair enough.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Choose to consider giving your prof a bad eval.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-02-24 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I mean that's the thing; I'm speaking from experience here.

Everyone who teaches--either a grade school teacher or a prof or a TA like me--have to recycle because otherwise we'd go crazy. There's no reason to totally recreate a class every year. But recycling involves editing. You improve things that might not have worked last year. You update slides when new scholarship comes out or procedures change. I've changed the direction of sections slightly because I knew I had a bunch of STEM majors and wanted to add more science and tech history.

That's the thing--good teaching isn't just repeating the same shit all the time. That's why this makes me angry. It's just... lazy. Plenty of lazy people skate but it's still not good.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: Choose to consider giving your prof a bad eval.

[personal profile] diet_poison 2016-02-25 02:24 pm (UTC)(link)
I ain't arguing.