case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-02-29 06:39 pm

[ SECRET POST #3344 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3344 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Vision/Wanda Maximoff (Marvel's The Avengers)]


__________________________________________________



04.
[New Tricks]


__________________________________________________



05.
[One Punch Man]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Karen Page, Daredevil (Netflix)]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Gamer's Guide to Pretty Much Everything]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Good Omens]


__________________________________________________



10.
[J.K. Rowling]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Ace Attorney 6]


__________________________________________________



12.
(Borderlands, Dameon Clarke)













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 056 secrets from Secret Submission Post #478.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Controversial Opinions Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-03-01 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
I'm so happy that people are getting pissed at Neil Degrasse Tyson for making science "pedantic", because that means a lot fewer people will be talking about how much they ~~~looooove science!!~~~ when what they actually like is easily-digestible Facebook-friendly non-thinky pop-sci. Pop-sci is like candy-- pretty good in small doses, but certainly not real food.

Re: Controversial Opinions Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-03-01 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
Where do you draw the line, though? Not sarcasm, just considering your point. Because I think it's a good one, but at the same time, there's so many different areas of science someone can be interested in.

I am sure it's annoying when people proclaim a love for science only to stare at you blankly when you get talking, though.

Re: Controversial Opinions Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-03-01 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
On this note, I hate "I Fucking Love Science". I've followed them for years and they degrade more and more to the point where they just post clickbait and bullshit, small-scale "scientific" studies that will get them clicks. It's hypocritical and shitty.

Re: Controversial Opinions Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-03-01 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
Nah, you're wrong and stuck-up. As long as it's all true, pop-sci is science. Science isn't just the complex stuff.

Re: Controversial Opinions Thread

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2016-03-01 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
As a scientist, +1.

Re: Controversial Opinions Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-03-01 04:26 am (UTC)(link)
This.

Going, "You don't love science! You just like looking at pictures of nebulae and reblogging quotes from dead physicists!" is like going, "You're not a real Batman fan! Tell me the volume number for the first appearance of Killer Croc!"
It's pathetic.
sparrow_lately: (Default)

Re: Controversial Opinions Thread

[personal profile] sparrow_lately 2016-03-01 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
Neil Degrasse Tyson is also such a smug ass it makes me want to scream, so if he's starting to catch flack for it I'm a happy bunny