[ SECRET POST #3345 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3345 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.

__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #478.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Twitter trust and safety council

[ketita]

I always thought that out of the things-to-be-censored, the most clear-cut thing with which I can agree is a direct call to violence. That's the sort of thing that shouldn't be particularly subjective, and is basically bad imo.

Re: Twitter trust and safety council

[iceyred]

I can roll with that. Even the U.S. government recognizes that inciting violence is not protected.

Re: Twitter trust and safety council

[ketita]

tbh, I think a more pertinent issue is the question of Twitter and the internet as a public or a private space. I would argue that any site that has a TOS is 100% allowed to censor whatever they want. Just like you can throw somebody out of your house if you don't like them, even if you don't have any good reason for that.
So, how much of the internet is free?

Re: Twitter trust and safety council

[iceyred]

I agree with that as well, and had they said 'We don't like a,b, and c, and we will not allow it on our site, and it is our site and we can choose what is and is not allowed and etc. etc.' then I wouldn't have batted an eye. But to make this shady council thing, fill it with known anti-free speech activists who all fall on one end of the political spectrum, and claim this is all in the name of making the site safe? Bull.

I'm side-eyeing you, Twitter. Side-eyein' real hard.

Re: Twitter trust and safety council

[(Anonymous)]

I agree that is the fundamental question here. The internet is only as free as those hosting the content allow it to be.

To continue your analogy... if you start throwing lots of your friends out of your house - for good reason or no - you might find your circle of friends begin to dwindle. And if you rely on those friends to buy your Avon, you're screwed.