[ SECRET POST #3352 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3352 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 032 secrets from Secret Submission Post #479.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Not like those other fans

[(Anonymous)]

I disagree about the last one. Well, to some extent. To me, as a rule, "canon" is only what exists in the narrative itself. It's not that author intent should be discounted or anything, it's just it's not canon to me in the same way. After all, what happens when an author, ten, twenty, thirty years down the line suddenly changes something about the work? Reminds me of when Anne Rice rewrote Lestat as a repentant Christian. I don't buy that characterization and I don't consider it canon, and I don't feel bad about that.

But at the same time, no fan interpretation is more canon, obviously. Absolutely the author has every right to create new works in the same world, to say whatever they want to say about it, and entitled fans are obnoxious.

Re: Not like those other fans

[cbrachyrhynchos]

So, no Frank Miller Batman or Berman/Piller Trek?

Re: Not like those other fans

[nonnymouscawitz]

I'm not bugged by people who disagree, I'm just bugged by people who are massive assholes about it. But I would still personally say that, going with the Anne Rice example, her interpretation of her own text is more valid of my own. It's just that I hate her interpretation so I would acknowledge it and then thoroughly ignore it.