[ SECRET POST #3353 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3353 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Beverly Hills Cop 3]


__________________________________________________



03.
[New Tricks]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Lord of the Rings]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Splatoon]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Tessa Stone/Not Drunk Enough/Hanna is not a Boy's Name]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Actor Frank Kelly, playing Father Jack Hackett in Father Ted]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Frasier]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Jem and the Holograms comic]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #479.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Batman V Superman

[(Anonymous)]

I agree. Batman and Superman were characters I grew up with. I loved seeing their crossover episodes in the DC animated universe. It should be awesome to see a live action version. But they're doing it in the absolutely worst way, stripping out everything interesting about the characters and leaving them not just bad, but boring.

Re: Batman V Superman

[kaijinscendre]

Yeah, I loved the animated series as well. I just don't understand how they are going so wrong with the movies. And why are they trying to add so many characters at once?

Re: Batman V Superman

[(Anonymous)]

I have heard some talk regarding their approach, mainly that they have to catch up to Marvel so it makes sense to introduce a bunch of characters and THEN have their origin/first movies when people already know a bit about them.

But, it does feel like it's at the expense of the Batman vs Superman part of the movie. We'll have to see how it goes. I'm hopeful that it might all tie up in a way that makes it all work, but my hope is really, really faint.

Re: Batman V Superman

[kaijinscendre]

It seems so ass backwards. I think you need to establish individual characters before bringing them together. Unless you were going to focus on them as a group for all the movies (like LOTR).

DC should have just taken their time instead of trying to play catch up.

Re: Batman V Superman

[(Anonymous)]

I can sort of agree but I can also see the situation where you have Cyborg or Aquaman - characters no one outside of comics knows about. If you introduce them in the Justice League, then people will come to see Batman and Superman, but get introduced to Cyborg/etc. They see this cool character and then recognize him when his own movie gets made, and more people will come see the movie. Marvel is doing something similar with Black Panther right now.

I mean, theoretically it's a sound idea. I'm wary of their actual execution though.

Re: Batman V Superman

[kaijinscendre]

Yeah, Marvel did that with Black Widow, Hawkeye, Falcon, etc. But Marvel also tended to wait for the second movies to do that instead of introducing 2 characters at once.