case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-03-10 06:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #3354 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3354 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Yu-Gi-Oh]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09. [ warning for homophobia / transphobia / misogyny take your pick, people seem to be divided on this one ]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 009 secrets from Secret Submission Post #479.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Mansplaining

(Anonymous) 2016-03-11 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
Like other people have said, the exact definition of mansplaining isn't very specific and differs from person to person, but one thing I thought was generally agreed on was that it involved explaining (hence, y'know, the "splaining" part). There's no explaining anything going on in that movie quote, so it's not mansplaining.

Re: Mansplaining

(Anonymous) 2016-03-11 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
Right. If he'd been like, "Now, ladies, you know these ghosts are potentially dangerous, we should probably do something about them..."

Re: Mansplaining

(Anonymous) 2016-03-11 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
agreed.