[ SECRET POST #3355 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3355 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[The Lord of the Rings]



__________________________________________________



02.
[Digimon Story: Cyber Sleuth]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Partners in Crime]


__________________________________________________



05.
[The 100]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________











08. [SPOILERS for Undertale]




__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for The 100]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #479.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Men of F!S

[(Anonymous)]

I'd agree, so to a degree I can understand why people might be hesitant to answer the thread. I'm trying to put people at ease as best I can (now. I did slip up and accuse someone of being defensive why they may not have been. Oops.) but Yeah, I suppose people are going to be nervouse about talking openly about this.

The second part of that comment is remarkably well thought out. I kind of agree, and I thank you for sharing your thoughts.

Re: Men of F!S

[(Anonymous)]

The question as you wrote it came off as suspiciously loaded. The use of the word "enough" implies a subjective limit, as someone downthread posited. This is why people don't want to answer it.

F!S has dealt with radfem trolls for a number of years and questions worded exactly like this are basically traps set by trolls so they can yell at someone for giving a "wrong" answer -- and all the answers are wrong. Instead of getting defensive (while accusing others of being defensive and aggressive) and insisting that the question wasn't loaded, you could actually explain what the fuck you were trying to get at when you asked that question.

Re: Men of F!S

[(Anonymous)]

I did respond below to that, but let me reiterate. "Enough" related to the question of whether people meet their own subjective limit.

I am aware of our history with the more ... forceful people here. I am not one of them, as demonstrated by the fact that I have shown no judgement or lack of respect to the few people who did answer my question. And saving that one slip up, which I point out again, I apologised for, I have been as respectful as possible to everyone.

What I was trying to get at has been explained already: I wanted to know if people lived up to their own ideas in this matter, and where those ideals sit. I insist the question wasn't loaded because it wasn't and that is what people keep throwing at me.

Re: Men of F!S

[(Anonymous)]

Maybe try this again tomorrow or perhaps better Monday, and rewrite the question to be more elaborate as to your intent. You could have asked directly, "do you feel you live up to your own standards on this?" You didn't, and now we have this shitshow of a thread you started. Good job.

Re: Men of F!S

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

Yeah, I get where you were coming from now, and I apologize for being snappish, it's been a long day. And it is... extremely, extremely loaded territory, you know? So anyway, yeah, sorry about that.

Re: Men of F!S

[(Anonymous)]

Don't worry about it.