case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-03-14 07:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #3358 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3358 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[Zootopia]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Zootopia]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 093 secrets from Secret Submission Post #480.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Academia question

(Anonymous) 2016-03-15 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
Save copies, or at least screenshots.

I can see how Tumblr is awful as a research platform with the rate a lot of people changes their names. That can be a solution for you though, if you change your name for a little while, source it to that name and then change back later. (Which isn't very ethical imo, but a solution)
ketita: (Default)

Re: Academia question

[personal profile] ketita 2016-03-15 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
Heh, that's a clever solution. It's probably best to just skip the chicanery and be as direct as I can, though. My academic standing is important to me, and I have some vague hopes about presenting this paper at a conference, too.

It's not just the name changes - it's the lack of a central hub to function as a community, the lack of any kind of coherent archiving, and the lack of community "borders" or "members" of any sort. Combine that with the INSANELY high traffic on tags, and I think that it would be almost impossible for someone outside of a specific tumblr fandom to actually do any meaningful research on it without interviewing members left and right.

Re: Academia question

(Anonymous) 2016-03-15 02:27 am (UTC)(link)
If it's something you want to present to a larger audience I would be as open as possible about your sources, especially as taking questions is usually part of it. I would assume that this would be a fairly new and interesting arena for many, and if the difficulty of researching the topic is such a large part of the paper as you say I would think you would get a lot of questions surrounding that.

Yeah, I can see how all of that can make it a very difficult job. I guess a survey could be a way to get meaningful data, but even then you have to be a visible part of the fandom to get any attention.