[ SECRET POST #3358 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3358 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[Zootopia]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Zootopia]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 093 secrets from Secret Submission Post #480.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I read allllllll the smut. :D I'm lucky that I'm in a fandom where SUPER LONG FICS are not the norm and the smut writing is fab. But experience in other fandoms tells me that quality depends on the writer, really, and multichapter fics can become very repetitive. I was reading some interesting essays on when to write smut and when to write around it, and it turns out I use the same sorts of guidelines (because I hate writing it but know it's narratively necessary at times) and the response to it is incredibly positive. I wrote a long fic recently where one of the main narrative thrusts boiled down to "X & Y have a torrid affair while falling in love and it gets incredibly messy", and despite the shittons of sex it only showed up in the fic a handful of times. And each time served a purpose beyond titilation; establishing the premise, showing them cross boundaries they knew not to, the disparity in the characters' mindsets when it all went to hell, and reconciliation and in sync sex when they finally managed to understand themselves, each other, and the situation they were in. Basically, smut in anything beyond PWP should serve a purpose, not there because it's been awhile and you think they should be getting off again.

[(Anonymous)]

What essay is this?

[(Anonymous)]

It was one "essay" (not really; I remembered the structure wrong) and a series of blog posts, quite old.

http://trickster.org/res/howtowrite.html
http://rosinalippi.com/weblog/sex-scenes-part-one-humor/

I don't agree with everything that is said, but they really helped me articulate why sex scenes do or do not work for me.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT So you hate writing smut and don't view titillation as the primary criteria for good smut. You are exactly the writer I'm talking about.

[(Anonymous)]

The writer with "tacked-on garbage, not erotic at all" ? LOL I will presume you either meant that I'm not the sort of writer you're talking about or we have very different criteria for what constitutes tacked on. Because while I will concede the latter is a possibility (I mean, I got enough comments that found the scenes hot but YMMV), 'tacked on' is the very antithesis of the scenes.

[(Anonymous)]

I was referring to the "not erotic at all".

[(Anonymous)]

Fair enough. Like I said, responses are pretty delighted but different strokes. (And no real ability to judge without linking the fics, and no thanks.) I will say that I *do* consider titalation as a major component of sex scenes, but that titalation is not enough in and of itself to make a scene. And I certainly hope people don't skip mine, from a story point of view, but fair enough if they do.