case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-03-16 06:22 pm

[ SECRET POST #3360 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3360 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Niche]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Rush Hour 1, 2, 3]


__________________________________________________



04.
["The Bride Was A Boy" manga]


__________________________________________________



05.
[J.K. Rowling]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Pretty Little Liars]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Twin Peaks]


__________________________________________________



08.
[The Walking Dead/The Flash]


__________________________________________________



09.
(GIRLS)


__________________________________________________



10.
[The Grinder]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Pokemon]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Lord of the Rings]


__________________________________________________



13.
[Babylon 5, Tolkien, Star Wars, Harry Potter]


__________________________________________________



14.
[Star Wars: The Force Awakens]


__________________________________________________



15.
[Pete Seeger]









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 032 secrets from Secret Submission Post #480.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-03-17 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
I definitely agree with that. "No-majes" is just awkward to say.

My main problem is actually that it's set in the 1920s, in which there was so much inventive slang, including nonsense words, that "no-maj" just seems too...boring. Like it's literally just "no magic" abbreviated, in a time period when America had phrases like "cash or check?" to refer to kissing. Just a liiiittle more inventive would have been nice.
ketita: (Default)

[personal profile] ketita 2016-03-17 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, I agree with you - and I've ranted about that in the past. A small excuse for that can be that it seems based on the history Rowling wrote that this term has been used since time immemorial in NA, (which is sort of weird in and of itself?). That still doesn't explain why 1920s wizards didn't have their own slang for it, though.

(Anonymous) 2016-03-17 04:14 pm (UTC)(link)
If it's been used the whole time in America, why didn't they just use muggle, since it's y'know...English? If the revolutionaries wanted a new word because screw England, even in the 1700s they could have come up with something more imaginative. Or does that mean it's a translation of the word for non-magic people in an indigenous language? In which case, why not just use that word instead of translating it into something so dully overdescriptive?

Maybe there will be some choice descriptors among the 1920s lingo, and "no-maj" is just the "official" term, and we just have to be patient.

(Anonymous) 2016-03-17 08:51 am (UTC)(link)
the 1920s thing has been bothering me since the start, 1920s American slang is some of the funniest, weirdest slang imaginable! why go with something so shit and boring?