Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-03-21 06:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #3365 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3365 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #481.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-21 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-21 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
The fifth book was probably my least favorite, but the sixth certainly wasn't the most stellar to me either. My perception of it is tainted though by the fact that a kid purposefully spoiled the ending for me though.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-21 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
I think it had to do with Harry being super moody and the book just being overall much darker than the others...but in hindsight I don't think moody!Harry would bother me very much now, in fact I'd probably empathize with him quite a bit more. He was rather blown off after all.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-22 02:28 am (UTC)(link)you might like it a lot more if you reread it! Both of my parents really disliked OotP their first read-through, but loved it the second. It's definitely a... frustrating book. Harry spends a lot of it moody and shut out of everything. But I personally think it's the strongest of the series because Harry's reactions to everything really ring true in a way that they don't in the last two books.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-22 03:45 am (UTC)(link)(It was the opposite for me, honestly - some of his reactions hit close enough to home to be genuinely discomforting to read.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-21 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)It seems like lots of fans dislike books 6 & 7 the most, and I can't help feeling it's because they had developed so many beloved ships and headcanons by the time HBP came out that they would have hated anything she wrote.
no subject
I agree with the Secret maker that for me it was the characters in book 6. A lot of people talked about how mean Ginny was in that book, but I honestly felt like Harry, Ron, and Hermione were all just as bad or worse. Everyone was just awful. But it was also that the story was for the most part dull. I liked the Harry and Dumbledore stuff, Tom Riddle's memories, and the end stuff. But the other stuff was really boring.
Then again, I don't much like the 6th movie either until the end. Just nothing much happens, the story doesn't move along all that much, and I find it kind of dull.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-22 12:18 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I'm totally cool with heroes making mistakes, I just don't want to be told it isn't actually a mistake.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-22 12:26 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-22 12:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-22 00:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-03-22 01:13 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-22 03:49 am (UTC)(link)It definitely makes it a little uncomfortable to go back and re-read some parts of the books, particularly 6.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-22 12:10 am (UTC)(link)I disliked them because I felt the the horror and supernatural phenomena were a lot less unique and more cliched than in previous books (zombie army? Really? That's not even 1/10ths as terrifying as the secret diary), the characterization was more boring especially considering how nuanced and sharp and amazing said characterization was in Book 5 (especially Harry and Hermione and Luna and Dumbledore) and the writing was more over-the-top (compare the wonderfully poignant and delicate emotion of the scenes after Harry returns from the graveyard in Goblet of Fire, to the dull excesses of Dumbledore's funeral scene).
It also had less implicit and unspoken content, less show-don't-tell, which Rowling had gotten really very good at doing in Books 4 and 5 but didn't capitalize on in 6 and 7 at all, and 6 and 7 I thought were overall just not as well written, and not in the way books 1 and 2 weren't as well written. Books 1 and 2 felt a little unpolished, a little awkward like a writer who hasn't honed her skill yet. Books 6 and 7 felt lazy and unrestrained.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-22 12:21 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-03-22 12:38 am (UTC)(link)Do you really...think that my previous comment is anything close to "critiquing"? That's...not a critique. At all. It's just a pointing out of how aspects of books 6 and 7 were disappointing in comparison to things the earlier books did well. It has nothing to do with being silly or sloppy or not being silly or sloppy.
I was emotionally affected by Books 1-5, and affected in more thought-provoking ways by books 4 and 5. I wasn't nearly as emotionally affected by Books 6 and 7, and they weren't nearly as thought-provoking either. That's not a "critique" on any "level." It's an emotional reaction.
no subject
no subject