case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-03-21 06:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #3365 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3365 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #481.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-03-22 04:21 am (UTC)(link)
I always wonder if the people who gripe about this realize just how many common names were either popularized or created by fiction writers in previous generations.

There are some names that would be ridiculous to give to a child, but as long as the name sounds like something an actual human might reasonably have, it's not horrible to give it to a child.

(Anonymous) 2016-03-22 05:20 am (UTC)(link)
This. I think something like, say, Leia is a pretty name even with the fandom context removed. I don't see how it's any weirder than a lot of existing names already out there in common use.