[ SECRET POST #3366 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3366 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #481.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: What movie franchise do you think would benefit from a smaller budget

[(Anonymous)]

The Hobbit. Having a large budget basically led to the movies being split into three, overuse of CGI, stuffing extra useless shit and making the last movie like one single battle.

Re: What movie franchise do you think would benefit from a smaller budget

[(Anonymous)]

Came here to say that. I read an article that suggested that PJ actually made it 3 movies because he wasn't sure he could cover the cost of production on 2; he was hedging his bets. If it was smaller, that wouldn't have been necessary.