case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-03-26 04:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #3370 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3370 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #482.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-03-26 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
You know, Kimmy Schmidt isn't great, but it's better than Girls, and it meets all of those criteria (female ran, female focused, and female positive). Also, since it's on Netflix, it makes a difference for most of it to watch it, whereas watching Girls without a Nielsen box is meaningless.
hwc: Red sneakers (Default)

[personal profile] hwc 2016-03-27 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
I actually really like Kimmy Schmidt. I love the positive vibe of the show and I think the characters are great overall. And Netflix actually recommended it me as a show with a strong female lead, lol.

I don't know Girls but if the criteria is female focused, female positive, female ran and not terrible Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt definitely fits.