Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-03-27 03:55 pm
[ SECRET POST #3371 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3371 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 059 secrets from Secret Submission Post #482.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-27 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-27 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)This one is... not.
Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-27 10:35 pm (UTC)(link)It's the cover equivalent of if Johnny Cash's Hurt had been about someone's broken leg. Might be a good song by a good singer, but missing the entire point.
Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-27 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)How do you take a song that begins "Sell the kids for food" and make it that? I feel like I should be having a slow dance at a hoedown.
Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-28 09:42 am (UTC)(link)I agree with what you're saying here (both about this cover and, in general, about Hurt). Except that ironically, Johnny Cash's version of Hurt was a cover. It's actually the perfect example of a cover that goes the opposite direction to Simpson's - it brings sincerity and weight of meaning to Reznor's original track.
Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-28 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)I think the fact that Cash's Hurt is a cover was the point of the original comment
Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-28 06:52 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-27 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)Wow, I think that's probably the first time Sturgill Simpson's been described as 'lacking edge'. Well, he does do a lot of psychotropic drugs so maybe he was just too high when arranging this cover lol.
Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-27 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)It sounds psychedelic for sure, but the original song was really bitter and this one sounds like it's all good bro just relax.
Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-27 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)Oh, fair enough then. Although towards the end of the song he ramps it up quite a bit, and it loses its 'bro relax' feel, which is a thing Sturgill does often in his songs.
Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-27 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-27 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)On his previous album he did a cover of an 80s pop song, and turned it into a sad ballad. I think he likes turning genres on their heads.
80s pop song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HI_xFQWiYU
Sturgill's cover: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eWJmN8D820
Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-27 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-27 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)Yeah, I get that. I guess I just don't have the same connection to the original, so whatever has been lost from it is going over my head.
Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-27 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-27 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)I have, but I'm still so unfamiliar with Nirvana and their intent to really make up my mind on it.
Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-27 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-27 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)Sturgill knows how to burn up a stage, man. That cover is him at his mildest. Comparing him to American Idol contestants is laughable.
Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-27 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Nirvana fans
(Anonymous) 2016-03-27 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)Eh, you win some you lose some.