[ SECRET POST #3380 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3380 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 031 secrets from Secret Submission Post #483.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Sounds like more of a feminist Sunday School lesson than a film.

[dancing_clown]

MTE. And while objectively, I know there's absolutely nothing wrong with having a checklist of things you want to see in a movie, something about lists like this get under my skin. Probably because none of the above guarantees a movie that isn't garbage.

Checking off actors you enjoy, good direction, realistic dialogue, nice sets, good effects, etc.: those are the making of a good movie. "OMG, two women don't live for romance, but can still be shippable AND one of them gets a soapbox speech?!!!" can exist independent of all other quality.

[(Anonymous)]

This seems like a really knee jerk, boring reaction to someone discussing specific aspects of a film.

[(Anonymous)]

+1

That's like thinking "two women have a conversation about something besides a man" is the main plot of a movie just because someone said it passed the Bechdel Test.

[(Anonymous)]

+3