case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-04-07 06:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #3382 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3382 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 093 secrets from Secret Submission Post #483.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

DA

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Isn't that the definition of queerbaiting?

But no, AYRT, most sports anime don't even have that. They're made for little boys, not fujoshi.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-04-07 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
but fujoshi work on them :^)

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-04-08 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
No one is implied to be queer = no queerbaiting.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-04-08 01:03 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt

I think it's pretty different in practice? Fanservice is putting the characters into suggestive situations/poses (some of which might be queer) for the general titillation of the audience. Queerbaiting is imo more specific. It's deliberately inserting lots and lots of shippy undertones to drag in viewers specifically interested in queer relationships, while overtly going the 'no homo' route.

So, Hannibal is fanservicey, Supernatural is queerbaity.