[ SECRET POST #3387 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3387 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #484.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Natalie Portman is not in Thor 3

[(Anonymous)]

Let us celebrate. Hopefully this means less time will be spent on Earth. Hopefully we will get some warrior ladies. Disney has Gwendoline Christie in their pockets, lets see her as a Valkyrie or something.

Hopefully, this does not mean more Darcy. I don't think I could stand more of her "funny" one liners.

Re: Natalie Portman is not in Thor 3

[(Anonymous)]

This means no Sif/Jane though :/

(maybe I'm the only one who wanted that)

Re: Natalie Portman is not in Thor 3

[philstar22]

I'm okay. But on the other hand, sounds like they are giving Thor a new love interest. Not so fond of that idea. I'd rather they go the Sif route, especially since that's his current canon comic love interest.

Re: Natalie Portman is not in Thor 3

[nightscale]

Honestly I'll miss Jane because I did like her, but maybe they'll actually spend more time exploring the other realms now, that'd be neat. I know we did get a new female casting but I can't remember the name and I don't know who she's going to be, could be an existing character, could be brand new.

Re: Natalie Portman is not in Thor 3

[nanslice]

Aw man. I love Jane. :\

Re: Natalie Portman is not in Thor 3

[(Anonymous)]

I'm happy for her personally, because she didn't really look like she wanted to be there in the last movie.

Re: Natalie Portman is not in Thor 3

[(Anonymous)]

Considering the shit she gets from the fandom, it's hard to blame her.

Re: Natalie Portman is not in Thor 3

[(Anonymous)]

I always feel like Portman is a great actress when it comes to ambitious character parts but she puts little to no effort into her acting when it's less prestigious movies. And she is terrible at acting interpersonal relationships, especially romances. So I won't miss her. But I'd wish her back tenfold if it meant no more Darcy.

Re: Natalie Portman is not in Thor 3

[(Anonymous)]

That sucks.

Re: Natalie Portman is not in Thor 3

[bcboomerangs]

Ugh, I don't want Darcy back.

I liked Jane well enough, and her geeking out on Asgard is cute as fuck, but I'm not attached to her the way I am Pepper.

But please, if there's no Jane, PLEASE keep Darcy away.

Re: Natalie Portman is not in Thor 3

[eleganceliberty]

Can't say I'll miss Jane all that much, but for the love of everything, please let this mean there's no more Darcy. She was, to me, the worst aspect of the first Thor movie (overly quippy and inappropriately timed comic relief characters, be they male or female, annoy me to no end. I blame watching too many Disney movies as a kid, lmao).

I wouldn't be surprised if they introduce Valkyrie to take her place, tbh. And while I'm a Sif/Beta Ray Bill shipper, it's no skin off my back if they finally hook Sif and Thor up in 'Ragnarok', simply because BRB isn't in the MCU, ahaha.