[ SECRET POST #3387 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3387 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #484.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Natalie Portman is not in Thor 3

[eleganceliberty]

Can't say I'll miss Jane all that much, but for the love of everything, please let this mean there's no more Darcy. She was, to me, the worst aspect of the first Thor movie (overly quippy and inappropriately timed comic relief characters, be they male or female, annoy me to no end. I blame watching too many Disney movies as a kid, lmao).

I wouldn't be surprised if they introduce Valkyrie to take her place, tbh. And while I'm a Sif/Beta Ray Bill shipper, it's no skin off my back if they finally hook Sif and Thor up in 'Ragnarok', simply because BRB isn't in the MCU, ahaha.