[ SECRET POST #3389 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3389 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #484.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Video Games Economics

[(Anonymous)]

If you aren't already reading the Dungeonomics column at Critical Hits, you should be.

http://www.critical-hits.com/blog/category/critical-hits/columns/dungeonomics/

FFVIII handled the problem really well: you're paid a salary, and you can sell things that you make from (what are USUALLY) items you'd expect a monster to drop when it dies. You're a trained professional, so random people aren't going to be able to replace you!

Re: Video Games Economics

[ketita]

Thanks for the link! I will check those out :)

There are definitely some games which make more sense in terms of how things are constructed - I was specifically thinking about the ones that don't, though, like many of the early Jrpgs.

Contrast with FFVII, though, where you end the game basically fucking loaded. Even if we assume that there was some sort of economical downturn with the loss of Midgar and Shinra, as long as the money is still being used, Cloud's pretty rich. Obviously, this is from a while of basically non-stop killing monsters all day every day.

Re: Video Games Economics

[(Anonymous)]

Adventurers have a social responsibility to use Gil Toss to return a fair share back to the monster side of the economy. But there are no regulations preventing the offshoring of monster profits.