[ SECRET POST #3393 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3393 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #485.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Redemption

[(Anonymous)]

If the character had been written or acted with that level of nuance, you might have a point. But he wasn't, so you don't. You are, of course, entitled to any head canons that float your boat. That's all this is, though. A head canon that makes you feel better about the character.

Re: Redemption

[fishnchips]

He absolutely was acted with that level of nuance. And he was also written like that to a point - you just didn't pay any attention to the subtext.

Re: Redemption

[(Anonymous)]

You're grasping for straws and calling it subtlety. The movie was fun, but not as nearly deep as you'd have to pretend it is to justify your interpretation of the character. The bubblegum wrappers aren't a secret message and Martin Freeman isn't supporting Johnlock with his microexpressions.

Re: Redemption

[fishnchips]

Nobody said it was deep. Thing is, what the other anon said is in the movie, and not even in a subtle way. If you missed it, that's your problem, but people like you are the ones grasping at straws to keep their unfitting analogies alive just because you apparently slept through key scenes/missed massively obvious and unsubtle implications/don't know how acting works.

Re: Redemption

[(Anonymous)]

Whatever helps you keep the dream alive. Ron Weasley is so Dumbledore!

Re: Redemption

[fishnchips]

What.

Re: Redemption

[(Anonymous)]

The people like you are the ones who seem to think the movie is deep. Every Tumblr essay talks about how subversive and brilliant it was to make its villain in the mold of the true terror we face today, the cishet white American male. Which is just lmao. Nobody who worked on the film was trying to make the grand social commentary you want them to be making. They were just trying to make characters general audiences would enjoy and have "feels" about.