case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-04-21 05:13 pm

[ SECRET POST #3396 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3396 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[Robert DeNiro]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 015 secrets from Secret Submission Post #485.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-04-22 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
It only looks nuanced. Saying "we need to have a conversation about this" is a little disingenuous because there's no real debate amongst scientists about whether or not vaccines cause autism. They don't. That's a pretty short conversation!

But anti-vaxxers who refuse to accept this know that they've got a bad reputation now, so they're dialing it back a bit and revising their phrasing. It's like FOX News saying oh, we're not saying that black people are violent, we're just saying that the nation needs to pay attention to black on black violence, and all lives matter, etc. etc. That's not nuance. It's just indirect enough to fool people into thinking they're being reasonable.