case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-04-27 06:13 pm

[ SECRET POST #3402 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3402 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 046 secrets from Secret Submission Post #486.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-04-27 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
To be fair, it doesn't rule it out. But it would be so compounded with his upbringing that it would be nearly impossible to discern without official word.

[personal profile] sachiko_san 2016-04-28 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, that's true, but I'm of the thinking that unless they officially say something about a character's mental disabilities, that people shouldn't go around diagnosing fictional characters with them.

(Anonymous) 2016-04-28 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
"Shouldn't"? What are you, the fandom police?

It's a headcanon. You're flying very closely to erasure. Fictional characters don't care. You're not being harmed.

Just because you dislike doesn't mean people "shouldn't" have fun in fandom.

[personal profile] sachiko_san 2016-04-28 02:25 am (UTC)(link)
There's fun and there's being an outright moron.

Erasure? Of what? Please tell me who I'm hurting because I think headcanons are stupid? Couldn't possibly be any real people.

(Anonymous) 2016-04-28 02:49 am (UTC)(link)
You literally said people shouldn't headcanon fictional characters in a particular way (disabled). That is being the erasing fun police. Why's it hurting you that you demand people don't headcanon in ways you don't like? What's so special about your headcanons that they're allowed but others are not? Why are you so invested in shooting down character interpretations?