[ SECRET POST #3405 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3405 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #487.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random picture of a dog ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Do bisexual woman have the right to use the word faggot?

[(Anonymous)]

When used on a trans woman, isn't it an masculinity assigning insult instead of masculinity detracting one?

Re: Do bisexual woman have the right to use the word faggot?

[(Anonymous)]

Sure. But when I say it's "masculinity-targeting", take that how you will. To a trans woman, it's an insult that tells them they are sissy men, and to non-trans men, it tells them they are sissy men.

Re: Do bisexual woman have the right to use the word faggot?

[(Anonymous)]

But *sissy* men and sissy *men* are two very different concepts, even from the abusers point of view. The shift in emphasis is an important distinction.

Re: Do bisexual woman have the right to use the word faggot?

[diet_poison]

The shift in emphasis explains why it's being used as an insult, but it's still a slur and still degrading. Why would it mean one group has less right to reclaim it?

Re: Do bisexual woman have the right to use the word faggot?

[(Anonymous)]

If gay men are reclaiming it then they are using its affirmation of still being men as the point of it. That means it is a double insult for trans-women. An insult from the original bigots, and now an insult for their fellow LGBT spectrum campaigners. And vice versa, since if trans women reclaimed it then it is an affirmation of a lack of masculinity which is an insult to the gay men.

That is why you got to be careful about reclaiming, because you will probably really only be compounding the insult and stereotype most of the time. It is better to fight for an abolition of a term than to fight to "reclaim" it.