Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-05-01 03:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #3406 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3406 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 056 secrets from Secret Submission Post #487.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Well, for my part...
(Anonymous) 2016-05-01 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)I especially notice this with how she writes women. On the one hand, it really like that Flynn writes complex, flawed, not-entirely-likable women with believable strengths - strengths that are no less admirable for the fact that they can be buried under a lot of other personal shit. On the other hand, Flynn writes a lot of female characters, and the very best of them (by which I mean kindest and strongest) can be described as...neutral*. Many are iffy - a bit mean, a bit callous, or else self-involved and petty. And the scale ranges from there, all the way to "Vicious Serial Killing Psycho" (of whom there are several). The way Flynn characterizes women isn't very charitable, is I suppose what I'm saying. And I think if you were somehow able to melt down every depiction of a woman in each of Flynn's novels into one substance, you would get something quite a bit more petty and cruel and selfish and pitiful than your average real life woman. Which, again, can chafe with me a bit.