case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-05-02 06:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #3407 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3407 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Star Wars Rebels]


__________________________________________________



03.
[J.K. Rowling/Harry Potter]


__________________________________________________



04.
[omgcp]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Hannibal, Criminal Minds, John Douglas]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Gamer]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Trailer Park Boys]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Chris Evans]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Old Hollywood, Old Hollywood RPF]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Andrew Lincoln]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 046 secrets from Secret Submission Post #487.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
I mean, I'm not a huge Stephen Fry fan at the moment, so good for her? Honestly, though, sometimes audio books do change a word or two, don't they? Do they always get permission from teh author? I'd think that would go through agents and publishers, not just ringing her up. I'm not sure I buy this, tbh.

But even if it's absolutely true: good for her. Defining her motives is for her only, if it's "just" revenge, then that's a bit petty. But authors have the right to decide on their words. Not narrators of audiobooks.

(If he was a jerk to her, why did she agree to have him narrate??)