[ SECRET POST #3411 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3411 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















11. [SPOILERS for Homestuck]




__________________________________________________















12. [WARNING for rape]




__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for rape, torture, abuse]




__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for underage]




__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for rape]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #487.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Politics Thread

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, we do. We haven't learned that lesson any other way, and we are still sliding towards surrendering important civil rights under Hillary too. It is just going more slowly. By all means, lets keep slowly boiling this frog 'cause that won't end badly either.

Re: Politics Thread

[diet_poison]

Can you give really specific examples of how we're "sliding towards surrendering important civil rights under Hillary"?

I'll be honest with you, your line of thinking is genuinely frightening to me.

Re: Politics Thread

[(Anonymous)]

TTIP. It is all about surrender of civil rights to corporate entities, and Hillary is a major cheerleader for it. Law and Order privacy rights are also things she will take a strong line against. She'll probably also continue her previous policy stances on black male youths, which will see more and more fed to for-profit prisons.

Re: Politics Thread

[(Anonymous)]

surrender of civil rights to corporate entities

Because Donald Trump is anything but corporate.

Re: Politics Thread

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Donald Trump is happily taking advantage of the rules the establishment has created. But he is a foolishly proud man. He thinks America is being made a laughingstock in terms of trade, and he can't stand it. I think his pride would lead him to make that a top priority.

Of course, that same foolish pride could be disastrous to foreign policy. But you'd be making a big mistake to think Trump puts money above his reputation.

Re: Politics Thread

[(Anonymous)]

And that is irrelevant to the goal of waking the democrat party machine up. In fact the more of an autocratic disaster Trump is, the sooner the wake up will be. The goal is for the Democrat party machine to stop backing candidates like him, not to stop him from doing anything.

Re: Politics Thread

[(Anonymous)]

Has the "throw a tantrum when you don't get your way so that they all feel sorry for you and let you get your way next time" method ever worked? Cause I really don't think it does.

Re: Politics Thread

[diet_poison]

The goal is for the Democrat party machine to stop backing candidates like him

Wait, backing who?

Also I still think this accelerationist shit is dangerous, and I don't think it will work, either.

Re: Politics Thread

[diet_poison]

TTIP. It is all about surrender of civil rights to corporate entities, and Hillary is a major cheerleader for it.

Citation? It looks like she's against TTIP though she's been kinda waffly on it in the past (not surprising for her).

Law and Order privacy rights are also things she will take a strong line against.

What do you mean by this and why do you think she will be against it?

She'll probably also continue her previous policy stances on black male youths, which will see more and more fed to for-profit prisons.

It's my understanding that she made a racist comment once alluding to black men (though Trump still wins the racism competition in this race hands-down) but that's not a policy stance? Who would actually shoot themselves in the foot by actually suggesting legislature based on race?

Re: Politics Thread

[(Anonymous)]

Accelerationism is a stupid philosophy for stupid people.

Re: Politics Thread

[(Anonymous)]

What a solid argument.

Re: Politics Thread

[insanenoodlyguy]

Has it occured to you that nobody will learn their lesson, again? That everything will be shittier and the only thing that will bet aken from it would be "I guess we shouldn't have voted for that one guy?" changing nothing about how they voted or why?

Cause that's humanity.

Re: Politics Thread

[(Anonymous)]

I agree with this in theory. But then I look at the elite establishment GOP, which is absolutely being taught a lesson by their voter base right now, and I see AYRT's point as well.