Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-05-10 06:22 pm
[ SECRET POST #3415 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3415 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 027 secrets from Secret Submission Post #488.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

One Direction Babygate
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)https://www.buzzfeed.com/elliewoodward/theres-a-conspiracy-theory-that-louis-tomlinsons-baby-is-fak?utm_term=.ypOe0BRxe#.pt8eY7G4e
As someone who isn't into One Direction, reading this as an outsider, it's kind of simultaneously horrifying and fascinating?
What does everyone think of this? Is there any validity at all? A grain of truth? Maybe the photos have been staged for another reason? (No, I don't think Harry and Louis are top secret butt soulmates.) Some of the evidence for photomanipulation does seem pretty solid to my untrained eyes?
I'm so freaking curious what everyone thinks of this, especially if you're like me and don't have a horse in the race.
Re: One Direction Babygate
Re: One Direction Babygate
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 12:07 am (UTC)(link)Re: One Direction Babygate
I'm telling OP what I think, since OP wants to hear from "everyone" and especially those who "don't have a horse in the race."
Re: One Direction Babygate
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 12:55 am (UTC)(link)Re: One Direction Babygate
Somehow, I don't think I'm the one with the tree trunk up my ass, here.
Re: One Direction Babygate
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 01:05 am (UTC)(link)Re: One Direction Babygate
Re: One Direction Babygate
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 01:14 am (UTC)(link)Re: One Direction Babygate
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 01:16 am (UTC)(link)Re: One Direction Babygate
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 01:23 am (UTC)(link)Re: One Direction Babygate
Re: One Direction Babygate
Re: One Direction Babygate
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 07:02 am (UTC)(link)Re: One Direction Babygate
PS - Are you still butthurt that I hate RDJ? Really?
Re: One Direction Babygate
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 12:01 am (UTC)(link)Re: One Direction Babygate
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 12:11 am (UTC)(link)Re: One Direction Babygate
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 12:15 am (UTC)(link)Re: One Direction Babygate
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 12:43 am (UTC)(link)Re: One Direction Babygate
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 12:54 am (UTC)(link)I'll also add that foreshortening and angles will distort the way a person looks in a photograph, accounting for things like hands looking bigger and hair looking different lengths.
Those posts are some next level whackadoodle bullshit.
Re: One Direction Babygate
This same shite goes on in Supernatural, especially when the Ackles and Padalecki kids were first born. It was all a sham, the wives were beards, surrogates, whatever, blah blah blah. Pretty damn terrifying and also amazingly gross and creepy.
I don't get that kind of 'fandom'.
Re: One Direction Babygate
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 11:18 am (UTC)(link)(By hardcore, I don't mean people who play with theories and speculate for lulz. I mean... people who do this shit and feel entitled to harassing whoever they consider to be "covering up the truth." Fuck those people.)