Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-05-10 06:22 pm
[ SECRET POST #3415 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3415 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 027 secrets from Secret Submission Post #488.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 01:42 am (UTC)(link)Or yeah, the Woodstock Saga by Michael Tod. That had like freaking squirrel incest. Then there was that book about deer... I used to read a lot of animal stories, and like, they have SO much more death than books about humans, I swear. Even Redwall has a lot of killing, I mean (though I wouldn't really count that one, since they're so anthropomorphized and even wear clothing and such. They're basically humans). I read Animal Farm when I was like 12, too. I think a lot of kids read that in middle school, don't they?
Watership Down just seems to be very in line with the sort of genre it's a part of. Maybe modern children's lit is really toned-down and censored or something? Idk, I think I was like 8 when I read it, and I thought it was awesome. Kids love gore and violence. Look at fairy tales. Then again, as a child I was all about reading the original stuff. The modern versions are boring by comparison...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 01:48 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 04:33 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 01:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Not people.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Not sure why, unless you're the anon who seems to *live* to find Hitler-like moral fault with my every remark.
But, whatever. You do you. Bye bye.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 01:38 pm (UTC)(link)