case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-05-14 03:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #3419 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3419 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Shingeki no Kyojin]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
["Seitenkango, Shinyuu to" by Eroe]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #489.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
nanslice: (Default)

Re: Threesomes, OT3, Multiples

[personal profile] nanslice 2016-05-14 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I typically like V relationships, where two people are kinda of sharing the third. I have no idea if this counts as poly.

However I'm really getting into Bucky/Steve/Sam in a much more open, "we three like each other, just in different ways" kind of capacity. :D

Re: Threesomes, OT3, Multiples

(Anonymous) 2016-05-14 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
V relationships counts as poly. There are countless formations within poly. So much so that "polycule" is a very useful term.
ext_18500: My non-fandom OC Oraania. She's crazy. (Default)

Re: Threesomes, OT3, Multiples

[identity profile] mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com 2016-05-15 06:54 am (UTC)(link)
I am given to understand that if the V is working on a mutual agreement and not a competition, it's poly. A big part of poly is that everyone communicates and everyone knows and understands where the others' links go.