[ SECRET POST #3420 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3420 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[Banana Fish]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #489.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Are they problematic?

[(Anonymous)]

OP

But I kinda need to know what he's done before I can decide that.

Re: Are they problematic?

[(Anonymous)]

Google is your best friend.

Re: Are they problematic?

[(Anonymous)]

Not really google give me news, which is unreliable (Look at Jimmy Saville, where were you on that on, news media?) and partisan political blogs. I need to find a moderate space I trust to give me both sides. Like here.

Re: Are they problematic?

[(Anonymous)]

But Jimmy Saville points up the issue which is that no one really knew until everyone knew. And similarly we're just as unreliable as partisan political blogs.

Re: Are they problematic?

[(Anonymous)]

Loads of people knew. The media said shit. Perhaps a better example would be Bill Cosby or Mike Tyson.

Re: Are they problematic?

[(Anonymous)]

Sure, those are better examples.

But in those cases - well, in Tyson's case, it was easily accessible and reported on. He went to prison for it, it's just the media didn't take it seriously. And with Cosby, I think, the Cosby affair shows that there has been a complete watershed change in how we approach these things and that in general there are enough people out there and paying attention that you're not going to be able to completely ignore those things any more. Like, I really do think that's a fundamental change. Not that it's going to actually lead to consequences for all of those involved - but in the court of public opinion, there are going to be people out there publicizing these things basically from now on. It's almost a pre-Cosby and a post-Cosby world.

Re: Are they problematic?

[(Anonymous)]

"I need to find a moderate space I trust to give me both sides. Like here."

As enjoyable as this place is, I'd say that's a rather naive assumption to make.

Re: Are they problematic?

[(Anonymous)]

...so you're going to rely on a bunch of mostly anonymous jagweeds on fandomsecrets for accurate news on the matter? Good luck with that