Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-05-15 04:24 pm
[ SECRET POST #3420 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3420 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

[Banana Fish]
__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #489.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-15 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)I know it sounds strange, but I don't look at the character as if there's something wrong with him. He acknowledges his condition and refuses to let it slow him down in life.
What I'm trying to say is that there's nothing to be scared of, OP. It sounds like you write your diversified characters with respect, and I'm sure that would continue with disabled characters.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-05-15 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
The key, as with anything, is to do your research, treat the character respectfully as a whole person, and be open to critique if someone comes to you with concerns.
no subject
I have a wheelchair-bound character in one of my original comic projects, and his disability has absolutely no bearing on the plot or his character arc whatsoever. But I had at least two acquaintances I know told me it was ridiculous (for lack of a better description) to have a wheelchair-bound character in a futuristic sci-fi based story. And I'm sure they won't be the last people to point that out... :/ But I strongly believe in seeing this character and his arc through (of which it plays no major part of), so I'm sticking with my guns on this one.
But yeah, treating them like characters first and foremost is an important part. If you focus too much on the disability, however well meaning you might be, it runs the risk of being borderline tokenism. There's a clear difference between a fully fleshed out character, who just so happens to have a disability, and a blatant attempt to score diversity points that solely focuses on that one aspect of the character and neglects everything else.