[ SECRET POST #3420 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3420 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[Banana Fish]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #489.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Are they problematic?

[(Anonymous)]

SA

Coming back to say that while I don't believe in disregarding or discrediting all of the very intelligent, on-the-mark things Greer has said and done in the feminist sphere, when I made my previous comment I did not realize that she has not only continued to hold transphobic opinions, she appears to have become more entrenched and vitriolic in her opinions on trans people. How disappointing.

I still wouldn't argue that she should "go fuck a cactus," as you put it, but I probably wouldn't have taken issue with your apparent fury towards her had I know that, rather than allowing her ignorance on trans matters to give way to open-mindedness over the decades as more information about transgenderism became available, she appears to have let her ignorance fester and turn to spite. :/