case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-05-15 04:24 pm

[ SECRET POST #3420 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3420 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[Banana Fish]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #489.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-05-16 01:30 pm (UTC)(link)
So only oppressed people should ever appear on movies, TV and other media? Okay.

(Anonymous) 2016-05-16 01:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Only oppressed people need representation, and are being wronged in a real way when they don't get it. It's fine for creators to include asexual characters if they want to, but they aren't morally obligated to pander to aces any more than they're obligated to include "furry representation" or "model train enthusiast representation".

(Anonymous) 2016-05-16 03:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Being an asexual isn't like having a kink or a hobby. Like, at all.

(Anonymous) 2016-05-16 04:04 pm (UTC)(link)
They are alike in that none of them are oppressed.