[ SECRET POST #3420 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3420 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[Banana Fish]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #489.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

It's pretty clear it's meant to be a "happily ever after" thing. Disney failed by making Anna and Kristoff romantic. It was unnecessary and only there because Disney NEEDS to include romance, and they're not brave enough to completely remove themselves from their generic formula. Brave was okay but had its own problems.

If Disney actually gave a crap about what it was trying to do with Frozen, Kristoff and Hans wouldn't have existed in the first place. They were only there so they could go, "SEE??? SEE??? WE'RE DOING AN ABNORMAL THING AREN'T WE SO GREAT. LOOK AT THIS ~MESSAGE~". There was no real effort behind it. You can defend this decision all you want, but it still greatly undermined what they were trying to do with the movie, especially when Anna and Elsa have significantly less speaking roles than the unnecessary surplus of male characters despite being a movie about sisterly love. Kristoff easily could've been replaced with the thief girl from the original fairytale. But nah. There had to be a marketable romance somewhere.